Blockchain  ·  Sector  ·  Project

Crypto Ecosystem Atlas

Every major crypto project, organized by the blockchain where it lives. Search any token — like BONK — and instantly see its native chain, sector, narrative, and origin. Explore 32 ecosystems from the top down.

—
Projects
—
Ecosystems
—
Sectors
★
Rating System
Start Exploring Browse Encyclopedia
AAA+ Industry Defining AAA Category Leader AA Elite A Strong B+ Above Average B Solid C+ Average C Below Average D High Risk F Avoid Methodology →

Explore by Ecosystem

Click any blockchain to see its full ecosystem map — infrastructure, DeFi, memes, and everything in between.

Master Index

ProjectSymbolChain SectorGrade⊞★

How to Use the Atlas

Search any project name or ticker in the bar above. Filter by chain, sector, or origin. Click a blockchain card to explore its full ecosystem, organized by sector. Click any project name to see live market data — price, market cap, token supply, whitepapers, and more. Every project carries the same metadata: native chain, sector, sub-sector, narrative, origin classification, and launch year.

Origin Classification

Native — built for that blockchain (Jupiter → Solana).   Ecosystem Chain — a chain built as part of the parent ecosystem (Base → Ethereum, Lightning → Bitcoin).   Multichain — originated on one chain, officially expanded elsewhere (Aave, USDC, Chainlink).

Sector Color Guide

Not financial advice. The Atlas is an educational reference. Inclusion is not an endorsement. Cryptocurrency is highly volatile and speculative — always do your own research (DYOR).

Asset Comparison

Side-by-side market data

CGH Master Rating System

How we score every project — 90% objective data, 10% analyst judgment

Grade Scale

AAA+97–100 — Industry Defining
AAA93–96 — Category Leader
AA89–92 — Elite
A85–88 — Strong
B+80–84 — Above Average
B75–79 — Solid
C+70–74 — Average
C65–69 — Below Average
D60–64 — High Risk
F<60 — Avoid / Dead / Abandoned

Part I: Ecosystem Importance Score (EIS)

"If this project disappeared tomorrow, how much would its ecosystem suffer?"

Ecosystem Dependency20%
User Adoption15%
Financial Usage15%
Liquidity Importance10%
Developer Integration10%
Infrastructure Importance10%
Ecosystem Reach10%
Revenue Sustainability5%
Community Strength5%

Part II: Investment Quality Score (IQS)

"How strong is this investment over the next 5–10 years?"

Leadership & Team15%
Development Activity15%
Product-Market Fit15%
Tokenomics10%
Financial Strength10%
Competitive Moat10%
Ecosystem Growth10%
Security & Reliability5%
Regulatory Position5%
Innovation5%

Red Flag Penalties

Major exploit (>$100M), unresolved−10
Multiple critical exploits−15
Founder fraud conviction−25
Project abandoned−40
No development 12+ months−20
Hyperinflationary tokenomics−10
Severe governance failure−10
Regulatory action, material impact−5 to −15

Bonus Multipliers (capped at +10)

Institutional adoption by major financial firms+3
Category leader by market share+3
Top developer ecosystem+2
Proven resilience across market cycles+2
Sustainable, growing protocol revenue+2

Overall Score

Overall = 50% EIS + 50% IQS (after penalties and bonuses). The overall score determines the letter grade.

Review Types

Analyst-reviewed: Hand-scored by CGH analysts using on-chain data, TVL metrics, developer activity, and market research. 30 core projects currently have full analyst reviews.

Automated: Scored algorithmically based on chain importance, sector, project status, origin, and ecosystem data. Marked clearly in each rating dashboard. These are systematically refined over time as projects are upgraded to analyst-reviewed status.